[Wien] electron occupancy in dmatup/dn

prasad jayasena prasad.j86 at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 29 08:52:45 CEST 2019


 
Dear prof. Peter and Tran 

Thank you very much for your guidance. I went through the paper Dr. Tran mentioned (and several other papers of course) to understand occupation matrix. It was very helpful and I could grab diagonal occupation matrix. I am still confused with the way defining off-diagonal matrix. I m continuing reading to understand the way it is taken. Meanwhile I want to continue the calculation for diagonal case. 

In my case there are two uranium atoms with U5+ and U6+ configuration, (which means 5f0 6d1 7s0  and 5f0 6d0 7s0 electron configuration). Thus I believe I have to consider only "five" diagonal elements (for U5+)  and hope no need for U6+ atom. 

However I could not understand the calculation procedure. In their paper they said " we impose one particular diagonal occu-pation matrix during the first 10 steps of the first self-consistent cycle. This constraint is then lifted and the calculation is left to converge on its own. " 

My question is where I have to put the occupation matrix and with what values I have to go with after the 10th iteration?




Prof. Peter
I am not sure why, but my scf output files does not show any QTL (case.dmatup/dn files are empty) value. Is this because the calculation wrong? I will redo this and will let you know.

Thank you again.
Prasad
    On Sunday, July 28, 2019, 1:54:37 p.m. CST, Peter Blaha <pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:  
 
 The trace of the dmat is about 0.38 f electrons for the first atom. You 
should see the same number in the corresponding case.scf2  :QTL  line.

It looks very small for U, in particular when you say that the other 
spin is similar, but I don't know any details.
First thing to do is always a regular PBE calculations. What are your 
results there ?

Please follow ALWAYS the recommended procedure:

init -sp
runsp
save pbe
x lapwdm -up/-dn
runsp -orb



Am 27.07.2019 um 22:00 schrieb prasad jayasena:
> Dear wien2k experts
> 
> I trying to understand density matrix in my calculation with wien2k and 
> I do not have a strong chemistry background.
> 
> I went through several research papers and mailing list. In my 
> case.dmatdn file I find follows
> 
>      1 atom density matrix
>      3  0.000000  0.000000  0.000000 L, Lx,Ly,Lz in global orthogonal system
>       7.0912546943894E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>      -3.6693845819671E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       2.4373528948560E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>      -1.5075261658481E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 4.6390168314472E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 6.8288170705364E-03     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 2.5065098115310E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>      -3.6693845819671E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       4.9032881076530E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>      -3.2624934826366E-03     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       2.4373528948560E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 6.8288170705364E-03     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 4.8251844354138E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 6.8288170705364E-03     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       2.4373528948560E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>      -3.2624934826366E-03     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       4.9032881076530E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>      -3.6693845819671E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 2.5065098115310E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 6.8288170705364E-03     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 4.6390168314472E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>      -1.5075261658481E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       2.4373528948560E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>      -3.6693845819671E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       7.0912546943894E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>      2 atom density matrix
>      3  0.000000  0.000000  0.000000 L, Lx,Ly,Lz in global orthogonal system
>       8.5906248781523E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       5.4581969618945E-03     1.8856396999089E-03      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       1.0378050531245E-02    -2.2716253233185E-02      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       2.1585329456663E-02    -3.9012706370743E-03
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 2.2489193790070E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 1.6453501908921E-03     1.5069057876921E-03
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 6.1272311195482E-03    -1.4717284041324E-02
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       5.4581969618945E-03    -1.8856396999089E-03      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       7.7904615518187E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       9.4486884160162E-03     9.5873755403030E-03      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       1.0378050531245E-02    -2.2716253233185E-02
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 1.6453501908921E-03    -1.5069057876921E-03
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 1.5206949708353E-01     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 1.6453501908921E-03     1.5069057876921E-03
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       1.0378050531245E-02     2.2716253233185E-02      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       9.4486884160162E-03    -9.5873755403030E-03      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       7.7904615518187E-02     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       5.4581969618945E-03     1.8856396999089E-03
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 6.1272311195482E-03     1.4717284041324E-02
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 1.6453501908921E-03    -1.5069057876921E-03
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00      
> 2.2489193790070E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
>       0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       2.1585329456663E-02     3.9012706370743E-03      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       1.0378050531245E-02     2.2716253233185E-02      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       5.4581969618945E-03    -1.8856396999089E-03      
> 0.0000000000000E+00     0.0000000000000E+00
>       8.5906248781523E-02     0.0000000000000E+00
> 
> 
> case.dmatup file is also the same shape with only slight changes.
> I guess (if I have understood correctly) this is correspond to the 
> configurations of no any electrons in spin-up and spin-dn. But I am 
> dealing with a Uranium compound and I am not sure this is acceptable?
> 
> If I need to check metastable state what I have to do?
> 
> I appreciate any help to understand this.
> Thank you for your time
> 
> Prasad
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300            FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: 
http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20190729/82999051/attachment.html>


More information about the Wien mailing list