[Wien] Why the GAP appeared in DOS plot is lower than the GAP obtained during "Analysis"

[Pavel Ondračka]

Another option is that you applied some broadening to your DOS, the gap
in the DOS than would look smaller.

Best regards
Pavel


On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 08:12 +0000, Tran, Fabien wrote:
> The gap shown in Analysis is :GAP in case.scf. If a different k-mesh
> (than the one used during the SCF calculation) is used for
> generating the DOS, then there may be a difference. Typically, one
> should increase the k-mesh for DOS.
> What is the difference between the gaps in Analysis and DOS in your
> case?
> 
> 
> From: Wien <wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> on behalf of
> shamik chakrabarti <shamik15041981 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 10:01 AM
> To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
> Subject: [Wien] Why the GAP appeared in DOS plot is lower than the
> GAP obtained during "Analysis"
>  
> Dear Wien2k users,
>    
>                              We have seen that the GAP appeared in
> DOS plot is lower than the GAP obtained during "Analysis". Why it is
> so? what is the meaning of GAP appeared during "Analysis"
> 
> Looking forward to your reply in this regard.
> 
> with regards,
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html