[Wien] error in hf+so calculaions

Microsoft.com team hammad_tarek at hotmail.com
Mon Apr 5 22:36:23 CEST 2021


Dear Prof. Gavin Abo
Thanks a lot for your kind help.
However, I removed all files from the case directory and started with structure file with no warning .
I use wien2k_19.1 complied with gfortran in parallel.
I used gmax = 16 in inhf and in2 files.
In init_hf step
The k-mesh was not redused with
nx = ny = nx = 1.
The run is continuing right now since almost 12 hours .
I found a warning in scfhf_1 file that " the value of gmax may be not large enough".
In addition, there are two errors in error files "hferror".
I send this message from my mobile because almost my workstation is hanged up because of computations.
I don't know should I wait more or I have to stop.
Thanks a lot once again.
Kind regards .
Tarek Hammad.


Get BlueMail for Android<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
On Apr 4, 2021, at 10:54 PM, Gavin Abo <gsabo at crimson.ua.edu<mailto:gsabo at crimson.ua.edu>> wrote:

I have encountered the "gmax in case.inhf larger than gmax in case.in2" before.  Though, in my case, it was for case.in2c in cycle 1 of the scf that the error occurred instead of case.in2.

In my case, it happened during a sloppy NiO calculation because gmax was 12 in NiO.in2c but I had put gmax 13 in NiO.inhf.  However, changing gmax back to the default value of 6 resolved the error for me.  You may need provide your output of "cat case.in2" and "cat case.inhf".

In my case, I was using WIEN2k 19.2 with all the patches at: https://github.com/gsabo/WIEN2k-Patches/tree/master/19.2

I did not see a mention of what WIEN2k version and patches you are using when getting the error.

Further details of that calculation are below:

username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:    Ubuntu
Description:    Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
Release:    20.04
Codename:    focal
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ cat $WIENROOT/WIEN2k_VERSION
WIEN2k_19.2 (Release 21/4/2020)
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ ls
NiO.struct
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ echo "1:localhost" > .machines
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ echo "1:localhost" >> .machines
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ echo "granularity:1" >> .machines
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ echo "extrafine:1" >> .machines
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ init_lapw -b -numk 10
...
  init_lapw finished ok
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ run_lapw -p
...
in cycle 9    ETEST: .0002786500000000   CTEST: .0254859
hup: Command not found.
STOP  LAPW0 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP  CORE  END
STOP  MIXER END
ec cc and fc_conv 1 1 1

>   stop
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ save_lapw -d NiO_pbe
...
broyden files deleted, clm*, dmat*, vorb*, vresp*, eece*, vsp*, vns*, scf, struct and input files saved under NiO_pbe/NiO

username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ init_so
The file NiO.in2c has been generated automatically

---->Please select the direction of the moment ( h k l )
               (For R-lattice in R coordinates)(default 0 0 1): 0 0 1
atom 1 is Ni1
atom 2 is Ni2
atom 3 is O

Select  atom-numbers (1,2,3) or "ranges of atoms" (1-3,9-12) (without blanks)
for which you would NOT like to add SO interaction
 (default none, just press "enter" ):

For large spin orbit effects it might be necessary to include many more
eigenstates from lapw1 by increasing EMAX in case.in1(c) - in case of
MPI-parallel calculations with ELPA nband has to be increased instead.

---->Please enter EMAX(default 5.0 Ryd): 5.0

The radial basis set for heavy atoms with p-semicore states is very
limited. One can improve this by adding RLOs. Note: you MUST NOT add
RLOs for atoms like oxygen,.... therefore the default is set to NONE
---->Add RLO for NONE, ALL, CHOOSE elements? (N/a/c) : N
 Check the generated NiO.inso file (RLOs,...)
 Check the generated NiO.in1 file (Emax and nband (if ELPA is used)
 at the bottom of the file)

In spinpolarized case SO may reduce symmetry.

The program symmetso detects the proper symmetry and creates new struct and
input files. (Note, equivalent atoms could become inequivalent in some cases).

Do you have a spinpolarized case (and want to run symmetso) ? (y/N)N

Spinorbit is now ready to run.
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ run_lapw -p -so
...
in cycle 3    ETEST: 0   CTEST: 0
hup: Command not found.
STOP  LAPW0 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP LAPWSO END
STOP LAPWSO END
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP  CORE  END
STOP  MIXER END
ec cc and fc_conv 1 1 1

>   stop
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ save_lapw -d NiO_pbe_SO
...
broyden files deleted, clm*, dmat*, vorb*, vresp*, eece*, vsp*, vns*, scf, struct and input files saved under NiO_pbe_SO/NiO

username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ init_hf
       Insulator, EF-inconsistency corrected
:GAP (global)   :  0.087445 Ry =     1.190 eV (accurate value if proper k-mesh)
:GAP (this spin):  0.087445 Ry =     1.190 eV (accurate value if proper k-mesh)
         Bandranges (emin - emax) and occupancy:
:BAN00034:  34    0.406506    0.448791  1.00000000
:BAN00035:  35    0.436574    0.456834  1.00000000
:BAN00036:  36    0.436574    0.456834  1.00000000
:BAN00037:  37    0.436989    0.464579  1.00000000
:BAN00038:  38    0.436989    0.464579  1.00000000
:BAN00039:  39    0.456413    0.469845  1.00000000
:BAN00040:  40    0.456413    0.469845  1.00000000
:BAN00041:  41    0.457796    0.474248  1.00000000
:BAN00042:  42    0.457796    0.474248  1.00000000
:BAN00043:  43    0.458976    0.491243  1.00000000
:BAN00044:  44    0.458976    0.491243  1.00000000
:BAN00045:  45    0.578689    0.587593  0.00000000
:BAN00046:  46    0.578689    0.587593  0.00000000
:BAN00047:  47    0.586114    0.590045  0.00000000
:BAN00048:  48    0.586114    0.590045  0.00000000
:BAN00049:  49    0.690945    0.982596  0.00000000
        Energy to separate low and high energystates:   -0.04609
...
Do you want to use a REDUCED k-mesh for HF (saving cpu-time) (Y/n) ?
n
...
How many k-points in the full BZ?
If you type 0 you can give 3 integers for nx,ny,nz
16
Do you want to shift? (0=no, 1=shift)
0
...
NiO.in0_grr and NiO.inhf and hf-kmesh prepared
Now do the hybrid calculation:   run_lapw -hf  ...
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ run_lapw -p -hf -so
hup: Command not found.
STOP  LAPW0 END
STOP  LAPW0 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP LAPWSO END
STOP LAPWSO END
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.10 80.0% 0+0k 0+2336io 0pf+0w
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP  CORE  END
STOP error: gmax in case.inhf larger than gmax in case.in2
STOP error: gmax in case.inhf larger than gmax in case.in2
[2]    Done                          ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timehf_$loop
[1]  + Done                          ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timehf_$loop

>   stop error
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ cat NiO.in2c
TOT             (TOT,FOR,QTL,EFG,FERMI)
   -12.0    44.0   0.50 0.05  1   EMIN, NE, ESEPERMIN, ESEPER0, iqtlsave
TETRA    0.000      (GAUSS,ROOT,TEMP,TETRA,ALL      eval)
  0 0  2 0  4 0  4 3  6 0  6 3  6 6
  0 0  2 0  4 0  4 3  6 0  6 3  6 6
  0 0  1 0  2 0  3 0  3 3  4 0  4 3  5 0  5 3  6 0  6 3  6 6
 12.00          GMAX
NOFILE        FILE/NOFILE  write recprlist
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ cat NiO.inhf
0.25         alpha
T            screened (T) or unscreened (F)
0.165        lambda
45           nband
13           gmax
3            lmaxe
3            lmaxv
1d-3         tolu
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ cat NiO.inhf
0.25         alpha
T            screened (T) or unscreened (F)
0.165        lambda
45           nband
6            gmax
3            lmaxe
3            lmaxv
1d-3         tolu
username at computername:~/wiendata/NiO$ run_lapw -p -hf -so
hup: Command not found.
STOP  LAPW0 END
STOP  LAPW0 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP  CORE  END
STOP  HF    END
STOP  HF    END
[2]  + Done                          ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timehf_$loop
[1]  + Done                          ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timehf_$loop
STOP  SUMHFPARA END
STOP LAPWSO END
STOP LAPWSO END
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.08 100.0% 0+0k 0+2336io 0pf+0w
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP  CORE  END
STOP  MIXER END
ec cc and fc_conv 0 1 1
in cycle 2    ETEST: 0   CTEST: 0
hup: Command not found.
STOP  LAPW0 END
STOP  LAPW0 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP  LAPW1 END
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP  HF    END
STOP  HF    END
[2]  + Done                          ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timehf_$loop
[1]  + Done                          ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timehf_$loop
STOP  SUMHFPARA END
STOP LAPWSO END
STOP LAPWSO END
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.10 80.0% 0+0k 0+2336io 0pf+0w
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP LAPW2 - FERMI; weights written
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  LAPW2 END
STOP  SUMPARA END
STOP  CORE  END
STOP  MIXER END
ec cc and fc_conv 0 1 1
in cycle 3    ETEST: 0   CTEST: 0
...

On 4/4/2021 8:42 AM, Tarek Hammad wrote:
Dear wien2k team and users

I successfully ran pbe calculatins

then, I initiate so and I ran so

later I initiate hf and

I ran hf+so calculations this returns:

" STOP error: gmax in case.inhf larger than gmax in case.in2
[1]    Done                          ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timehf_$loop"

I have tried to modify the value of gmax in both inhf and in2 files and again "run_lapw -hf -so -p"

but no way. Even, I initiate hf once again after removing the last inhf file but no way !!!

Would you help me please.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Tarek Hammad.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20210405/9bac2ca9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Wien mailing list