[Wien] Top surface layer seems to be isolated from the rest of the system

Dr. K. C. Bhamu kcbhamu85 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 25 15:16:34 CEST 2021


Thank you Prof. Peter for your good suggestion.

I have tried with passivating the bottom oxygen atoms that I consider equal
to removing those oxygen atoms.

I tried with 6 layers as well. I don't think more than 6 layers will fix
the problem.

Thank you,
Bhamu

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, 9:16 PM Peter Blaha <pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
wrote:

> Remove the O atoms, which are sticking out of the lower surface.
> This makes the system inversion symmetric and more realistic.
> Since you are now not stoichiometric anymore, eventually test with more
> than 5 layers .
>
> Am 25.06.2021 um 13:42 schrieb Dr. K. C. Bhamu:
> > Dear Prof. L. Marks,
> > Thanks for your suggestions.  Yes, WO3 is an insulator.
> >
> > I am facing the same issue for WC (SG: 187).
> >
> > I have worked on Ni(OH)2 and ZnO surfaces and I did not face any
> > difficulties there. Ni(OH) surface is also polar.
> >
> > For the present case, I do not have much choice. I was asked to provide
> > the absorbance of some molecules on the (100) surface of WO3. The
> > experimental group is not using any substrate/support for it.
> >
> > I will read up on oxide surfaces.
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> > Bhamu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:46 PM Laurence Marks
> > <laurence.marks at gmail.com <mailto:laurence.marks at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     N.B., your cell is polar, and you are not satisfying valence
> >     neutrality or Pauling's rules. It will never occur in reality, and
> >     any results you obtain with it will move science backwards.
> >
> >     Read up on oxide surfaces, much is known.
> >
> >     _____
> >     Professor Laurence Marks
> >     "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
> >     nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Györgyi
> >     www.numis.northwestern.edu <http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>
> >
> >     On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, 01:59 Laurence Marks <laurence.marks at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:laurence.marks at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         Did you check:
> >         a) The BVS, to ensure that you do not have a GIGO surface?
> >         b) Whether the system has a decent gap or not -- I believe WO3
> >         should be an insulator.
> >         c) Whether you are satisfying valence neutrality at the surface.
> >
> >         I expect you have a GIGO surface, 99.99% probability. You cannot
> >         just create an oxide supercell and expect it to lead to a
> >         realistic surface. Fixing layers won't help, and is flawed
> thinking.
> >
> >         GIGO.
> >
> >         _____
> >         Professor Laurence Marks
> >         "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think
> >         what nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Györgyi
> >         www.numis.northwestern.edu <http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>
> >
> >         On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, 01:31 Dr. K. C. Bhamu <kcbhamu85 at gmail.com
> >         <mailto:kcbhamu85 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >             Dear Wien2k Users,
> >
> >             I am trying to relax the WO3 surface structure (1x1x5 with
> >             15 Ang vacuum). The bulk structure crystallizes in  221 SG.
> >             Then I created the 1x1x5 layered structure and relaxed the
> >             top two layers with the bottom three layers kept fixed.
> >             I see after relaxation, the top layer detached from the
> >             system (the W-O bond length increased from 1.9 to 2.3 Ang),
> >             you can see from the PDF provided with this email.
> >             I have tried with QE as well and the same problem I faced
> there.
> >             I am wondering if someone has faced a similar experience and
> >             would like to share his/her experience with me to tackle
> >             this issue.
> >
> >             I have used a different strategy: with U, with U, with
> >             dipole correction, without dipole correction, vacuum up
> >             to 30Ang.
> >
> >             As the bulk system is a high symmetry system, is it the
> >             reason due to the symmetry? If so then how one can handle it?
> >
> >             I am providing the required information here in the tar
> >             file  (PLEASE DOWNLOAD FROM HERE
> >             <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://we.tl/t-0vedkrUS54__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!Day7KZQBXQaPn8HGxSpldvOiJzObtS73z_8I17izzlA5ZmuvSj27rMzSsjCo-bt6MCzNAQ$
> >).
> >
> >             I would appreciate it if someone shares their experience
> >             with me.
> >
> >             Regards
> >             Bhamu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >             _______________________________________________
> >             Wien mailing list
> >             Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> >             <mailto:Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!Day7KZQBXQaPn8HGxSpldvOiJzObtS73z_8I17izzlA5ZmuvSj27rMzSsjCo-btL6FGi9Q$
> >             <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!Day7KZQBXQaPn8HGxSpldvOiJzObtS73z_8I17izzlA5ZmuvSj27rMzSsjCo-btL6FGi9Q$
> >
> >
> >             SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!Day7KZQBXQaPn8HGxSpldvOiJzObtS73z_8I17izzlA5ZmuvSj27rMzSsjCo-btzLCeneQ$
> >             <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!Day7KZQBXQaPn8HGxSpldvOiJzObtS73z_8I17izzlA5ZmuvSj27rMzSsjCo-btzLCeneQ$
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Wien mailing list
> >     Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at <mailto:
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> >     http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> >     <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien>
> >     SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
> >     <
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wien mailing list
> > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> > SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
> >
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
> Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
> Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
> WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20210625/c09df646/attachment.htm>


More information about the Wien mailing list