[Wien] How to select the appropriate nband in hybrid functionals calculations
Tran, Fabien
fabien.tran at tuwien.ac.at
Fri May 14 21:24:13 CEST 2021
Hello,
There is probably an error message also in output.log. What is it?
________________________________
From: Wien <wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> on behalf of Yifan Ding <yfding0375 at foxmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 5:31 PM
To: wien
Subject: [Wien] How to select the appropriate nband in hybrid functionals calculations
Dear Wien2k developers,
When I tried to do hybrid functional calculation (YS-PBE0) on h-BN monolayer which was set a 4*4*1 supercell including 30 B atoms and 34 N atoms, all calculated attempts went wrong in the first loop.
The following content comes from case.dayfile:
> lcore (04:48:28) 0.546u 0.788s 0:01.66 79.5% 0+0k 0+0io 2pf+0w
> hf -redklist -p -c (04:48:30) running HF in parallel mode
** HF crashed!
0.159u 0.253s 0:06.88 5.8% 0+0k 0+40io 0pf+0w
error: command /public/software/wien2k/WIEN2k_14/hfcpara -c hf.def failed
> stop error
I searched past mailing lists and found that there are few questions about hybrid functional errors, and several questions and answers about hybrid functional errors can't solve my problems. I put my calculation steps below, and any comments would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
1. Initialization
[yurc at node71 bigc-tahybridtest1]$ init_hf_lapw
Insulator, EF-inconsistency corrected
:GAP : 0.1301 Ry = 1.769 eV (provided you have a proper k-mesh)
Bandranges (emin - emax) and occupancy:
:BAN00120: 120 -0.462509 -0.403568 2.00000000
:BAN00121: 121 -0.403194 -0.379922 2.00000000
:BAN00122: 122 -0.403039 -0.378604 2.00000000
:BAN00123: 123 -0.393649 -0.368830 2.00000000
:BAN00124: 124 -0.391842 -0.367239 2.00000000
:BAN00125: 125 -0.388449 -0.357020 2.00000000
:BAN00126: 126 -0.388279 -0.353847 2.00000000
:BAN00127: 127 -0.388042 -0.333360 2.00000000
:BAN00128: 128 -0.387867 -0.326951 2.00000000
:BAN00129: 129 -0.129916 -0.120609 2.00000000
:BAN00130: 130 -0.128004 -0.113769 2.00000000
:BAN00131: 131 0.016334 0.034382 0.00000000
:BAN00132: 132 0.016486 0.034448 0.00000000
:BAN00133: 133 0.038904 0.046957 0.00000000
:BAN00134: 134 0.039002 0.047860 0.00000000
:BAN00135: 135 0.041063 0.051186 0.00000000
Energy to separate low and high energystates: -1.10359
:NOE : NUMBER OF ELECTRONS = 260.000
You must set NBAND to at least NB_occ + 1 and you have 260.00 electrons
edit bigc-tahybridtest1.inhf ...
PS: For very accurate calc. and large NBAND you may have to increase EMAX in bigc-tahybridtest1.in1 by hand
Prepare k-mesh for HF. Use identical mesh and shift for IBZ and FBZ
Do you want to use a REDUCED k-mesh for HF (saving cpu-time) (Y/n) ?
Y
This script runs x kgen twice and generates equivalent meshes in the
IBZ and FBZ.
KGEN ENDS
KGEN ENDS
How many k-points in full BZ?
If you type 0 you can give 3 numbers for nx,ny,nz
10
2 symmetry operations without inversion
inversion added (non-spinpolarized non-so calculation)
NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 allows to specify 3 divisions of G)
length of reciprocal lattice vectors: 0.383 0.383 0.083 3.586 3.586 0.778
Shift of k-mesh allowed. Do you want to shift: (0=no, 1=shift)
5 k-points generated, ndiv= 3 3 1
KGEN ENDS
0.000u 0.012s 0:00.06 16.6% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
1 symmetry operations without inversion
NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 allows to specify 3 divisions of G)
length of reciprocal lattice vectors: 0.383 0.383 0.083 3.586 3.586 0.778
Shift of k-mesh allowed. Do you want to shift: (0=no, 1=shift)
9 k-points generated, ndiv= 3 3 1
KGEN ENDS
0.000u 0.003s 0:00.04 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
Give nx,ny,nz for the reduced mesh
nx=?
1
ny=?
1
nz=?
1
1 symmetry operations without inversion
NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 allows to specify 3 divisions of G)
length of reciprocal lattice vectors: 0.383 0.383 0.083 0.000 0.000 0.000
Specify 3 mesh-divisions (n1,n2,n3):
Shift of k-mesh allowed. Do you want to shift: (0=no, 1=shift)
1 k-points generated, ndiv= 1 1 1
KGEN ENDS
0.000u 0.004s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
Now you can use run_lapw -hf -redklist ...
bigc-tahybridtest1.in0_grr and bigc-tahybridtest1.inhf and hf-kmesh prepared
Now do the hybrid calculation: run_lapw -hf -redklist ...
[yurc at node71 bigc-tahybridtest1]$
The content of the file case.inhf is as follows:
case.inhf
0.25 alpha
T screened (T) or unscreened (F)
0.165 lambda
136 nband
6 gmax
3 lmaxe
3 lmaxv
1d-3 tolu
2. SCF calculations
The command I used when submitting the calculation is "run_lapw -hf -redklist -ec 0.6 -p -i 999 > output.log".
3. error information
I tried many times to calculate and modify the parameters. Every time, the error appears in first cycle in Hf calculation. The following is the file with error message:
-rw-r--r-- 1 yurc users 61 May 13 04:48 hf.error
-rw-r--r-- 1 yurc users 12 May 13 04:48 hf_5.error
-rw-r--r-- 1 yurc users 12 May 13 04:48 hf_4.error
-rw-r--r-- 1 yurc users 12 May 13 04:48 hf_3.error
-rw-r--r-- 1 yurc users 12 May 13 04:48 hf_2.error
-rw-r--r-- 1 yurc users 12 May 13 04:48 hf_1.error
The content of hf.error is:
** Error in Parallel HF
** testerror: Error in Parallel HF
And the content of file from hf_1.error to hf_5.error is:
error in hf
Thank you again for reading my question. Any suggestions are welcome!
Yifan Ding
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS)
Address: No.8 Zhongguancun South 3rd Street, Haidian District, Beijing
100190 China
E-mail: yfding at iphy.ac.cn<mailto:yfding at iphy.ac.cn>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20210514/387af9d2/attachment.htm>
More information about the Wien
mailing list