[Wien] Basic question regarding mixing parameter & force optimization

[shamik chakrabarti]

Dear Prof. Tran,

                Thank you for your reply. It removes my confusion :)

On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 12:50, Tran, Fabien <fabien.tran at tuwien.ac.at> wrote:

> 0.01 should in principle leads to slower convergence, except of course if
> 0.2 is too large and does not allow for convergence at all.
>
> If the convergence can be achieved properly with 0.2 and 0.01, then the
> results should be identical.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Wien <wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> on behalf of shamik
> chakrabarti <shamik15041981 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 8:29 AM
> To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
> Subject: [Wien] Basic question regarding mixing parameter & force
> optimization
>
> Dear Wien2k users,
>
>                          I have few questions regarding mixing parameters
> & force optimization
> (1) If we reduce the mixing parameter from 0.2 to say 0.01, whether the
> convergence will come slowly?
> (2) Whether it will be accurate?
> (3) If we do not get force convergence with PORT should we go for
> NEWT/NEW1?
>
> Any response will be eagerly awaited.
>
> with regards,
>
> --
> Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
> Research Fellow
> Department of Physics
> Indian Institute of Technology Patna
> Bihta-801103
> Patna
> Bihar, India
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>


-- 
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20211006/b772ba0e/attachment.htm>