<DIV>Dear Peter and stefaan,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks for your comments.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best Wishes!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Yanming Ma<BR><BR><B><I>Peter Blaha <pblaha@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">> >This is known (and I hope stated somewhere in UG). The interstital DOS in SO<BR>> >calculations is NOT the interstital DOS.<BR>><BR>> I check through the whole mannul, I Can not find the concerning statement. As I know, for spin-polarized SO, the interstitial DOS is not the interstitial DOS. But for SO, without the spin-polarized case, there is no clear statement on what is the interstital DOS.<BR><BR>Maybe.<BR><BR>Anyway, I've never plotted an "interstital DOS" myself !!!<BR>I would not know for what purpose.<BR><BR>P.Blaha<BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna<BR>Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698<BR>Email: blaha@theochem.tuwien.ac.at WWW:
http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/<BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Wien mailing list<BR>Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<BR>http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Yanming Ma Ph.D<br>Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences,<br>National Research Councils of Canada,<br>Ottawa, Ontario<br>K1A 0R6<br>Canada<p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com/?__yltc=s%3A150000443%2Cd%3A22708228%2Cslk%3Atext%2Csec%3Amail">The New Yahoo! Shopping</a> - with improved product search