<DIV>Dear Peter,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>> >I find another problem is that the DOS for intersitial part is larger than the total DOS >>the case which I include Spin-Orbit coupling without spin-ploarized.<BR><BR>>This is known (and I hope stated somewhere in UG). The interstital DOS in SO<BR>>calculations is NOT the interstital DOS.<BR></DIV>
<DIV>I check through the whole mannul, I Can not find the concerning statement. As I know, for spin-polarized SO, the interstitial DOS is not the interstitial DOS. But for SO, without the spin-polarized case, there is no clear statement on what is the interstital DOS.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Any comments</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR> </DIV><BR><BR>Yanming Ma Ph.D<br>Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences,<br>National Research Councils of Canada,<br>Ottawa, Ontario<br>K1A 0R6<br>Canada<p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com/?__yltc=s%3A150000443%2Cd%3A22708228%2Cslk%3Atext%2Csec%3Amail">The New Yahoo! Shopping</a> - with improved product search