<div dir="ltr">Dear users,<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>This is my case.inorb file.</div><div><br></div><div><div> 1 2 0 nmod, natorb, ipr</div><div>PRATT 1.0 BROYD/PRATT, mixing</div><div> 1 1 2 iatom nlorb, lorb</div><div> 2 1 2 iatom nlorb, lorb</div><div> 1 nsic 0..AMF, 1..SIC, 2..HFM</div><div> 0.07 0.00 U J (Ry) Note: we recommend to use U_eff = U-J and J=0</div><div> 0.07 0.00 U J</div></div><div><br></div><div>If there is any problem, please give me some advice.</div><div>And if my case.inorb is correct, I think the step-by-step procedure for this calculation is wrong. </div><div>Please give me any possible reasons for the same calculated total energies for different U values. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>All my best,</div><div>Jihoon Park</div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Jihoon Park <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:maximumenergyproduct@gmail.com" target="_blank">maximumenergyproduct@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Yes, I used it.<div><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:15 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tran@theochem.tuwien.ac.at" target="_blank">tran@theochem.tuwien.ac.at</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Did you use run calculation with the -orb flag: runsp_lapw -orb<div><div><br>
<br>
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Jihoon Park wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear users,<br>
<br>
I have tried to add GGA+U with different U values, but always get the same total energies.<br>
The steps that I did are as follows:<br>
1. Do spin-polarized calculation.<br>
2. setup spin-orbit coupling and orbital pot (DFT+U) together.<br>
3. Run<br>
<br>
This procedure is very simple and straightforward, but I don't know why there is no difference for different U values.<br>
Would you please let me know what mistakes I have been making?<br>
<br>
<br>
All my best,<br>
Jihoon Park<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wien mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at" target="_blank">Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at</a><br>
<a href="http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien</a><br>
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>