<p dir="ltr">Dear Gavin abin <br>
Thanks Sir for the reply, but I ran it for 60 cycle two times with commands <br>
runsp-lapw -p -orb -ec 0.0001 -cc 0.0001 -i 60<br>
Regards <br>
Sikander </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 8 Mar 2016 14:36, "Gavin Abo" <<a href="mailto:gsabo@crimson.ua.edu">gsabo@crimson.ua.edu</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">How many cycles did the calculation run for and what did you set for the maximum number of iterations (i.e., the number that you set for the -i option)?<br>
<br>
If you did not use the -i option, just<br>
<br>
run_lapw or runsp_lapw<br>
<br>
The program will run up to 40 cycles by default.<br>
<br>
It is common for a mBJ calculation to not be able to reach converge within 40 cycles [1-3], which is why it suggests during the running of init_mbj that you increase the maximum number of interactions. The example the init_mbj script gives is to set -i to 80:<br>
<br>
run_lapw -i 80 (or runsp_lapw -i 80)<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg06119.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg06119.html</a><br>
[2] <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg09879.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg09879.html</a><br>
[3] <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg02833.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg02833.html</a><br>
<br>
On 3/8/2016 3:51 AM, sikander Azam wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Dear all<br>
I am doing calculations using mBJ plus U, but when the calculations complete, I get that energy is not converged. But when I check the SCF file I get a constant value of 0.52341000 for energy convergence and 0.345680000 values for charge convergence.<br>
So I don't understand on the logic. please help me that what should I do. Should I continue with these calculations and find the properties or some one will give me some suggestions.<br>
Thanks in advance.<br>
Regards<br>
Azam<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wien mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at" target="_blank">Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at</a><br>
<a href="http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien</a><br>
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html</a><br>
</blockquote></div>