<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>   Hi Gavin,<br><br></div>   Thank you very much ! I will take a look !<br></div>   All the best,<br></div>                   Luis<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-11-22 9:50 GMT-02:00 Gavin Abo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gsabo@crimson.ua.edu" target="_blank">gsabo@crimson.ua.edu</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="m_244283466058420212moz-cite-prefix">Perhaps do a google search for
      correlated materials.  For example, maybe the following references
      are of interest:<br>
      <br>
<a class="m_244283466058420212moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strongly_correlated_material#Electronic_structures" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<wbr>Strongly_correlated_material#<wbr>Electronic_structures</a><br>
      <a class="m_244283466058420212moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.3355v1" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.<wbr>3355v1</a> (Section 1. LDA+U vs
      Hartree-Fock and Exact Exchange)<br>
      <a class="m_244283466058420212moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.cond-mat.de/events/correl12/manuscripts/" target="_blank">http://www.cond-mat.de/events/<wbr>correl12/manuscripts/</a> (The LDA+U
      Approach: A Simple Hubbard Correction for Correlated Ground
      States)<div><div class="h5"><br>
      <br>
      On 11/22/2016 3:28 AM, Luis Ogando wrote:<br>
    </div></div></div><div><div class="h5">
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>   Thank you Pablo !<br>
            </div>
               I am looking for something introductory like wikipedia.
            Do you have some reference "in this direction" ?<br>
          </div>
             All the best,<br>
        </div>
                          Luis<br>
        <br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2016-11-21 15:25 GMT-02:00 delamora <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:delamora@unam.mx" target="_blank">delamora@unam.mx</a>></span>:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div id="m_244283466058420212m_-1049646723207799152divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" dir="ltr">
                <p>Luis, look for Hubbard Model</p>
                <p>NaCl U2</p>
                <p>          Pablo<br>
                </p>
              </div>
              <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
              <div id="m_244283466058420212m_-1049646723207799152divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt" face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>De:</b> Wien <<a href="mailto:wien-bounces@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at" target="_blank">wien-bounces@zeus.theochem.tu<wbr>wien.ac.at</a>>
                  en nombre de Luis Ogando <<a href="mailto:lcodacal@gmail.com" target="_blank">lcodacal@gmail.com</a>><br>
                  <b>Enviado:</b> lunes, 21 de noviembre de 2016
                  11:00:23 a. m.<span><br>
                    <b>Para:</b> A Mailing list for WIEN2k users<br>
                    <b>Asunto:</b> Re: [Wien] Hartree-Fock and the
                    Hubbard Model</span></font>
                <div> </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div class="m_244283466058420212h5">
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>
                        <div>Dear Prof. Tran,<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                           I would like to read more about this subject,
                        but, unfortunately, your link gave me a message
                        like : " Wikipedia does not have an article with
                        this exact name. "<br>
                      </div>
                      <div>   Please<b>,</b> could you suggest another
                        non-specialist reference like wikipedia ?<br>
                      </div>
                      <div>   Thank you,<br>
                      </div>
                      <div>               Luis<br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">2016-11-20 13:28
                        GMT-02:00 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tran@theochem.tuwien.ac.at" target="_blank">tran@theochem.tuwien.ac.at</a>></span>:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                          Hi,<br>
                          <br>
                          DFT+U is a cheap but rather rough
                          approximation of HF.<br>
                          Beside this, there is also the difference that
                          in DFT+U, the Coulomb<br>
                          operator is attenuated in order to account for
                          the screening due to<br>
                          correlation. In HF, no correlation is
                          included.<br>
                          In hybrids, the screening is included by using
                          only ~25% of HF exchange<br>
                          (and there is also correlation coming from a
                          LDA/GGA correlation term).<br>
                          <br>
                          Hybrid, onsite-hybrid and DFT+U are more or
                          less the same,<br>
                          since all of them are one-electron methods and
                          mix HF with LDA/GGA.<br>
                          As Karel said, they are better than LDA/GGA,
                          but can not reproduce<br>
                          the experimental observations that are beyond
                          the one-electron methods.<br>
                          DMFT is better since it is a beyond
                          one-electrons method.<br>
                          <br>
                          Read that:<br>
                          <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDA+U" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<wbr>LDA+U</a><br>
                          <br>
                          FT
                          <div class="m_244283466058420212m_-1049646723207799152HOEnZb">
                            <div class="m_244283466058420212m_-1049646723207799152h5"><br>
                              <br>
                              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                                On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, delamora wrote:<br>
                                <br>
                                <br>
                                Dear Fabien Tran and Karel Vyborny,<br>
                                <br>
                                Thanks for your comments.<br>
                                <br>
                                <br>
                                What I want to know is if the Hartree
                                Fock exchange is what the Hubbard U is<br>
                                trying to model<br>
                                <br>
                                What I know is that for strong
                                intraatomic repulsion, 3d and 4f, the
                                Hubbard<br>
                                U gives good results, although the U is
                                a parameter.<br>
                                <br>
                                But for intermediate intraatomic
                                repulsion, 4d, 5d, 5f then more
                                expensive<br>
                                methods are needed, such as DMFT<br>
                                <br>
                                So, if this is the case that the Hartree
                                Fock exchange is what the Hubbard U<br>
                                is trying to model then the hybrid
                                functionals would do a better job.<br>
                                <br>
                                So, my question is; What are the Hubbard
                                U and DMFT trying to model?<br>
                                <br>
                                <br>
                                Cheers<br>
                                <br>
                                          Pablo de la Mora</blockquote>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </div></div></div>

<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Wien mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at">Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.<wbr>at</a><br>
<a href="http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.<wbr>ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien</a><br>
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/<wbr>wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.<wbr>at/index.html</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>