<div dir="auto">Why are you using 0.05 for the amount of exact exchange? You must justify that this is valid (you, not me).</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sep 11, 2017 2:24 PM, "Abderrahmane Reggad" <<a href="mailto:jazairdz@gmail.com">jazairdz@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Hi all<br>
<br>
</div>
I have repeated the calculation using ec and cc criterion equal to 0.00001 and 0.0001 respectively and I have found the magnetic moment to be lesser with the value of 0.0002 MB.<br>
<br>
</div>
Here are the input files<br>
<br>
</div>
VS.struct<br>
***********<br>
<br>
VS-hex <wbr> <wbr> <br>
H LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 3 164_P-3m1 <wbr> <br>
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang <wbr> <br>
6.020859 6.020859 11.637259 90.000000 90.000000120.000000 <wbr> <br>
ATOM -1: X=0.00000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.00000000<br>
MULT= 1 ISPLIT= 4<br>
V 1 NPT= 781 R0=0.00005000 RMT= 2.4200 Z: 23.0 <br>
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000<br>
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000<br>
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000<br>
ATOM -2: X=0.00000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.50000000<br>
MULT= 1 ISPLIT= 4<br>
V 2 NPT= 781 R0=0.00005000 RMT= 2.4200 Z: 23.0 <br>
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000<br>
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000<br>
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000<br>
ATOM -3: X=0.33333333 Y=0.66666667 Z=0.25000000<br>
MULT= 2 ISPLIT= 4<br>
-3: X=0.66666667 Y=0.33333333 Z=0.75000000<br>
S 1 NPT= 781 R0=0.00010000 RMT= 2.0800 Z: 16.0 <br>
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000<br>
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000<br>
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000<br>
12 NUMBER OF SYMMETRY OPERATIONS<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
VS.ineece<br>
************<br>
<br>
-12.0 2 emin natom<br>
1 1 2 iatom nlorb lorb<br>
2 1 2 iatom nlorb lorb<br>
EECE HYBR / EECE mode<br>
0.05 amount of exact exchange<br>
<br>
</div>
VS.indm<br>
**********<br>
<br>
-12. Emin cutoff energy<br>
2 number of atoms for which density matrix is calculated<br>
1 1 2 index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1<br>
2 1 2 dtto for 2nd atom, repeat NATOM times<br>
0 0 r-index, (l,s)index <br>
<br>
</div>
VS.inst<br>
*********<br>
<br>
V<br>
Ar 2 <br>
3, 2,2.0 N<br>
3, 2,1.0 N<br>
4,-1,1.0 N<br>
4,-1,1.0 N<br>
V<br>
Ar 2 <br>
3, 2,1.0 N<br>
3, 2,2.0 N<br>
4,-1,1.0 N<br>
4,-1,1.0 N<br>
S<br>
Ne 3 <br>
3,-1,1.0 N<br>
3,-1,1.0 N<br>
3, 1,1.0 N<br>
3, 1,1.0 N<br>
3,-2,1.0 N<br>
3,-2,1.0 N<br>
****<br>
**** END of input (instgen_lapw)<br>
<br>
</div>
NB: Even in ferromagnetic (spin-polarized) calculation i found a similar value for magnertic moment.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
Best regards<br>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div>