<div dir="ltr">I want to make a general point on this list, namely the importance of depositing atomic positions in a standard format (e.g. CIF) with publications. I continue to see far too many DFT papers with a Figure and a few selected bond lengths, but insufficient information for someone to reproduce the results in detail. This is particularly true for surface structures, but quite general in the DFT community.<div><br></div><div>If you submit a paper to the Wien2k publication list, I will urge you to also deposit a CIF with it. (Sorry Karlheinz for the extra work.) There may be other depositories that could be used; I know that Northwestern University now has one as do many of the DOE labs in the US.<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:12.8px">Professor Laurence Marks</span><br></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:12.8px">"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought", </span><span style="font-size:12.8px">Albert Szent-Gyorgi</span><br><a href="http://www.numis.northwestern.edu" target="_blank">www.numis.northwestern.edu</a> ; <span style="font-size:12.8px">Corrosion in 4D: </span><a href="http://MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu" style="font-size:12.8px" target="_blank">MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu</a><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Partner of the CFW 100% program for gender equity, </span><a href="http://www.cfw.org/100-percent" style="font-size:12.8px" target="_blank">www.cfw.org/100-percent</a></div><div>Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>