<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Maybe it doesn't help since I don't
remember if the lapw1 memory usage is larger than lapw2 or not.
However, I have found "x lapw1 -nmat_only" helpful for
estimation in the past:<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg08136.html">https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg08136.html</a><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"></font><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/26/2019 2:27 AM, Luc Fruchter
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:daefaa0d-d6ea-5feb-6847-e52c643c9c28@u-psud.fr">Yes, I
have shared memory. Swap on disk is disabled, so the system must
manage differently here.
<br>
<br>
I just wonder now: is there a way to estimate the memory needed
for the lapw2s, without running scf up to these ? Is this the
total .vector size ?</blockquote>
</body>
</html>