[Wien] about the nitrogen 2p states
Yushan Wang
wys at UDel.Edu
Sat Nov 8 23:09:23 CET 2003
I think I should appreciate your partial remarks on the N - 2p I posed
before. actually I have found something of N, different from O, as a
dopping element.
yushan wang
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 xn22 at drexel.edu wrote:
> I personally don't like the sentence in this email list as a scientific discussion
> forum.
>
> I just want to say that your fermi level was definitely wrong for single N_substitution of since for N all
> N-p and O-p are occupied even the highest N-p is half filled. I did those calculations
> for both DOS and bandstructure. WIEN is very good code but people who use it must have
> engough wisdom to analyze the output results. For multi N-substitution it could be true
> due the band crossing of N-p. But I didn't do those calculation. It is just guess.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Xiliang Nie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Yushan Wang <wys at udel.edu>
> Date: Saturday, November 8, 2003 1:29 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wien] about the nitrogen 2p states
>
> >
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > everyone has his or her points, keep it in your own heart if you
> > do not
> > hope
> > this mail list become messy.
> >
> > yushan
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Lukasz Plucinski wrote:
> >
> > > Dear WIEN2k Users,
> > >
> > > I think this discussion is not very nice.
> > >
> > > The truth is that the WIEN mailing list is something really
> > magnificent.> Almost every question is answered by experts.
> > >
> > > The bad thing is that many people do not treat these experts
> > seriously -
> > > they ask trivial questions and/or do not explain their problem
> > in detail,
> > > expecting that expert will complete the puzzle anyway.
> > >
> > > I think that if somebody is preparing a scientific paper using
> > WIEN she/he
> > > should be able to do it her/himself. At the end none of the
> > experts from
> > > this mailing list are on the authors list !
> > >
> > > I guess that even if the asked question is not answered there is
> > no reason
> > > to be angry. Its rather something special if the question is
> > answered and
> > > it must be appreciated that expert sacrifices his time to answer.
> > >
> > > Thus in general I agree with the Stefaan's point of view
> > although the
> > > whole discussion was really not nice... maybe such things not
> > related to
> > > physics should be filtered in future.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Lukasz
> > >
> > > > > it certainly is not the purpose of this list to solve physics
> > > > > questions that are not related to wien2k or DFT: our
> > mailboxes are
> > > > > already more than full enough!
> > > > >
> > > > > Stefaan
> > > >
> > > > I wll not reply even though you have a severe answer.
> > > > because this is not related to wien2k. but my previous question
> > > > was although you did not understand it.
> > > >
> > > > yushan wang
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wien mailing list
> > > > > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> > > > > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wien mailing list
> > > > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> > > > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wien mailing list
> > > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> > > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wien mailing list
> > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
More information about the Wien
mailing list