[Wien] transition state calculations

[Michael Gurnett]

Are you sure? removing 0.5 and then removing a further 0.5 would leave us
with a negatively charged crystal


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jorissen Kevin" <Kevin.Jorissen at ua.ac.be>
To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Wien] transition state calculations


> Would be good; but sometimes life is tough on us.
> Yes, you have to perform separate core hole calculations for all
inequivalent positions in the unit cell that you are interested in.
> By the way, add -0,5 in mixer, not 0,5.
> Alternatively, you can increase the number of valence electrons in
case.in2 by 0.5
>
> Good luck,
>
> Kevin.
>
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Michael Gurnett [mailto:michael.gurnett at kau.se]
> Sent: Fri 9/26/2003 2:36 PM
> To: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> Cc:
> Subject: [Wien] transition state calculations
>
>
>
>
> I was wondering if one performs calculations using Slater transition
> states for core-levels do I have to perform a full calculations for all
> atoms of interest ie remove 0.5 electrons and add 0.5 in mixer or can I
> remove 0.5 electrons from all atoms N and then add N*0.5 in mixer. I'm
> looking at about 20 atoms so 45 days doesn't sound like a good idea.
> Would be good if I could do it all in a single calculation.
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
>
>
>