[Wien] forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred

[Mahmoud Payami]

Dear Laurence,
Thank you very much for all your comments. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is ok.
By trying RH10 fedora core 2 and others (Mandrake10), I found and convinced
myself that the new linux kernels (2.6.x) are in conflict with Intel
compilers because they only support kernels 2.4.x. That is why I succeed in
RH8/Mandrake8.2 and failed in RH10/Mandrake10.

With best regards,
Mahmoud



> If you are not using -static (which one cannot on Redhat 9.0) you need to
> make sure that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set correctly to find the needed shared
> libraries, e.g. include in your .bashrc (with appropriate locations)
>
>
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/intel/mkl61/lib/32:/opt/intel_fc_80/lib:/opt/intel_cc_8
0/lib
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> This needs to be there for all nodes, so the libraries may need to be nfs
> mounted (or perhaps better, copied).
>
> As a caveat, mkl and fort have some duplicate library names, with
> different code. I asked Intel about this some time ago (i.e. which was
> better) and got no useful answer.
>
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Mahmoud Payami wrote:
>
> > Dear Laurence,
> >
> > I did not see any such printouts.
> > I also used RH10+Ifort8+MKL70, the result was:
> > Compilation was OK. But in the "x symmetry" step, the system could not
> > recognize the ifort-file: libcprts.so.5.
> > However, RH8+ifc7+icc7+mkl61 works without any error.
> > Do you know any such combinations with new softs that works?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Mahmoud
> >
>