[Wien] Lithium 1s energy

Michael Gurnett michael.gurnett at kau.se
Sun Mar 28 19:24:40 CEST 2004


TOTAL CHARGE INSIDE SPHERE  2.193461


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy


> How much is the total charge inside atomic sphere of Li ( grep CHA034
> case.scf).
>
> --- Michael Gurnett <michael.gurnett at kau.se> wrote:
> > here is the section of the outputst thate relates to the Li  atom
> >
> >
> >                    Li                                  RHFS
> >
> >  FOR SPIN  1   R-MT=   2.33000   R*V=  -1.69747  V=  -0.72853
> >  FOR SPIN  2   R-MT=   2.33000   R*V=  -1.40379  V=  -0.60249
> >
> >                     Li                                  RHFS
> >
> >          OCCUPANCY    ENERGY(RYD)         (R4)              (R2)
> > (R)               (R-1)             (R-3)
> >
> >   1S      1.000    -3.8020185E+00     6.0398011E-01     4.6571175E-01
> > 5.8185552E-01     2.6736967E+00
> >   1S      1.000    -3.7853614E+00     5.9864876E-01     4.6480244E-01
> > 5.8149416E-01     2.6739229E+00
> >   2S      1.000    -2.3674139E-01     5.1550135E+02     1.6895009E+01
> > 3.7790227E+00     3.6306727E-01
> >   2S      0.000    -3.3051131E-03     7.9024585E+03     5.5677693E+01
> > 6.0982284E+00     3.1786002E-01
> >
> >  TOTAL CHARGE FOR SPIN            1 :                  2.00000000000601
> >  TOTAL CHARGE FOR SPIN            1  INSIDE SPHERE:    1.16720862226228
> >  TOTAL CHARGE FOR SPIN            2 :                  1.00000000000582
> >  TOTAL CHARGE FOR SPIN            2  INSIDE SPHERE:   0.998873331134571
> >  TOTAL CHARGE in sigma FOR SPIN            1 :
> >    0.00000000000000D+000
> >  TOTAL CHARGE in sigma FOR SPIN            1 INSIDE SPHERE:
> >    0.00000000000000D+000
> >  TOTAL CHARGE in sigma FOR SPIN            2 :
> >    0.00000000000000D+000
> >  TOTAL CHARGE in sigma FOR SPIN            2 INSIDE SPHERE:
> >    0.00000000000000D+000
> >  TOTAL CORE-CHARGE:                  0.00000000000000D+000
> >  TOTAL CORE-CHARGE INSIDE SPHERE:    0.00000000000000D+000
> >
> >  TOTAL ENERGY (RYD):              -14.925886
> >      SUM OF EI:-7.8241213E+00     NUC:-3.4264121E+01
COUL:-1.8051997E+01
> >      V-XC SPIN 1:-2.4932921E+00     E-XC SPIN 1:-1.9494840E+00
> >      V-XC SPIN 2:-2.1166583E+00     E-XC SPIN 2:-1.6561688E+00
> >
> >                     Li                                  RHFS
> >
> >
> >                                                ORTHOGONALITY INTEGRALS
> >
> >                                   2S   1S           0.0000000
> >                                   2S   1S           0.0000000
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> > To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 6:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
> >
> >
> > > I am sorry, this problem is strang.
> > > I can suggest the following idea,
> > > 1. draw the total DOS of Li instead of Li s. it may help you to find
the
> > lost
> > >
> > >    electrons.
> > > 2. Look at the total charges inside the atomic sphere of Li. Is it a
> > reasonable
> > >
> > >    value ( a number between 2 and 3) ?
> > > I hope it can help.
> > >
> > > Bests,
> > > Javad
> > >
> > > --- Michael Gurnett <michael.gurnett at kau.se> wrote:
> > > > From the outputst file it is clear that Li1S is a semicore
state -3.8
> > ryd
> > > > approx, but still nothing in the DOS.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> > > > To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 12:21 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Michael,
> > > > > It is very strange that you have lost your Li 1s semicore
electrons.
> > It is
> > > > hard
> > > > > to believe that there is some physics behind it.
> > > > > As a last try, please send your case.outputst and your case.in1
files.
> > may
> > > > be
> > > > > by using this file some body can find what is wrong in your
> > calculations.
> > > > > Bests.
> > > > > Javad Hashemifar
> > > > > --- Michael Gurnett <michael.gurnett at kau.se> wrote:
> > > > > > yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Title
> > > > > >  -6.00 0.002 1.500 0.003   EMIN, DE, EMAX,
Gauss-broadening(>;de)
> > > > > >     6                      NUMBER OF DOS-CASES specified below
> > > > > >     0    1   total         atom, case=column in qtl-header,
label
> > > > > >     1    1   Atom1 tot
> > > > > >     1    2   Atom1 s
> > > > > >     1    3   Atom1 p
> > > > > >     2    1   Atom2 tot
> > > > > >    34    2   Atom34 s
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > > From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> > > > > > To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:36 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If I look at the s-Dos for atom 34 I have intensities
ranging
> > from
> > > > > > > > approximately -13 eV and up. There is no sign of any
intensity
> > > > > > between -13
> > > > > > > > and -100 eV.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did you lower Emin in case.int to proper values (may be -6.
Ryd)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Javad
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > > > > From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > > To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:05 AM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I am trying to figure out why "analysis" is giving an
energy
> > of
> > > > 0
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > the Li
> > > > > > > > > > 1S. The energy cut-off has been set to -6 ryd (the
system
> > > > consists
> > > > > > of 34
> > > > > > > > Ge
> > > > > > > > > > and 1 Li atom). The binding energy of the 1S should be
att
> > > > > > approximately
> > > > > > > > 55
> > > > > > > > > > eV relative to the top of the valence band maximum. Any
> > > > suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > Hello
> > > > > > > > > What about the partial DOS of Li 1S. Does it concentrated
> > around 0
> > > > Ryd
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > it is
> > > > > > > > > within a reasonable range.
> > > > > > > > > Bests,
> > > > > > > > > Javad Hashemifar
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > =====
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > > Javad Hashemifar
phone :
> > > > > > ++49-30-8413
> > > > > > > > 4804
> > > > > > > > > Permanent : Physics Department, Isfahan University of
> > Technology,
> > > > > > Isfahan,
> > > > > > > > Iran
> > > > > > > > > Current : Fritz-Haber-Institut der MPG, Faradayweg 4-6,
> > D-14195
> > > > > > Berlin,
> > > > > > > > Germany
> > > > > > > > > e-mails:  hashemi at fhi-berlin.mpg.de          &
> > > > > > > > hashemifar at ph.iut.ac.ir
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
> > > > > > > > > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wien mailing list
> > > > > > > > > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>





More information about the Wien mailing list