[Wien] Lithium 1s energy
Javad Hashemifar
s_javad at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 28 20:08:53 CEST 2004
>
> TOTAL CHARGE INSIDE SPHERE 2.193461
it means that your calculation is most likely true. I suggest to draw total DOS
of Li (instead of Li S). It may help you to find the lost electrons.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 7:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
>
>
> > How much is the total charge inside atomic sphere of Li ( grep CHA034
> > case.scf).
> >
> > --- Michael Gurnett <michael.gurnett at kau.se> wrote:
> > > here is the section of the outputst thate relates to the Li atom
> > >
> > >
> > > Li RHFS
> > >
> > > FOR SPIN 1 R-MT= 2.33000 R*V= -1.69747 V= -0.72853
> > > FOR SPIN 2 R-MT= 2.33000 R*V= -1.40379 V= -0.60249
> > >
> > > Li RHFS
> > >
> > > OCCUPANCY ENERGY(RYD) (R4) (R2)
> > > (R) (R-1) (R-3)
> > >
> > > 1S 1.000 -3.8020185E+00 6.0398011E-01 4.6571175E-01
> > > 5.8185552E-01 2.6736967E+00
> > > 1S 1.000 -3.7853614E+00 5.9864876E-01 4.6480244E-01
> > > 5.8149416E-01 2.6739229E+00
> > > 2S 1.000 -2.3674139E-01 5.1550135E+02 1.6895009E+01
> > > 3.7790227E+00 3.6306727E-01
> > > 2S 0.000 -3.3051131E-03 7.9024585E+03 5.5677693E+01
> > > 6.0982284E+00 3.1786002E-01
> > >
> > > TOTAL CHARGE FOR SPIN 1 : 2.00000000000601
> > > TOTAL CHARGE FOR SPIN 1 INSIDE SPHERE: 1.16720862226228
> > > TOTAL CHARGE FOR SPIN 2 : 1.00000000000582
> > > TOTAL CHARGE FOR SPIN 2 INSIDE SPHERE: 0.998873331134571
> > > TOTAL CHARGE in sigma FOR SPIN 1 :
> > > 0.00000000000000D+000
> > > TOTAL CHARGE in sigma FOR SPIN 1 INSIDE SPHERE:
> > > 0.00000000000000D+000
> > > TOTAL CHARGE in sigma FOR SPIN 2 :
> > > 0.00000000000000D+000
> > > TOTAL CHARGE in sigma FOR SPIN 2 INSIDE SPHERE:
> > > 0.00000000000000D+000
> > > TOTAL CORE-CHARGE: 0.00000000000000D+000
> > > TOTAL CORE-CHARGE INSIDE SPHERE: 0.00000000000000D+000
> > >
> > > TOTAL ENERGY (RYD): -14.925886
> > > SUM OF EI:-7.8241213E+00 NUC:-3.4264121E+01
> COUL:-1.8051997E+01
> > > V-XC SPIN 1:-2.4932921E+00 E-XC SPIN 1:-1.9494840E+00
> > > V-XC SPIN 2:-2.1166583E+00 E-XC SPIN 2:-1.6561688E+00
> > >
> > > Li RHFS
> > >
> > >
> > > ORTHOGONALITY INTEGRALS
> > >
> > > 2S 1S 0.0000000
> > > 2S 1S 0.0000000
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> > > To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 6:26 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am sorry, this problem is strang.
> > > > I can suggest the following idea,
> > > > 1. draw the total DOS of Li instead of Li s. it may help you to find
> the
> > > lost
> > > >
> > > > electrons.
> > > > 2. Look at the total charges inside the atomic sphere of Li. Is it a
> > > reasonable
> > > >
> > > > value ( a number between 2 and 3) ?
> > > > I hope it can help.
> > > >
> > > > Bests,
> > > > Javad
> > > >
> > > > --- Michael Gurnett <michael.gurnett at kau.se> wrote:
> > > > > From the outputst file it is clear that Li1S is a semicore
> state -3.8
> > > ryd
> > > > > approx, but still nothing in the DOS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> > > > > To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 12:21 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Michael,
> > > > > > It is very strange that you have lost your Li 1s semicore
> electrons.
> > > It is
> > > > > hard
> > > > > > to believe that there is some physics behind it.
> > > > > > As a last try, please send your case.outputst and your case.in1
> files.
> > > may
> > > > > be
> > > > > > by using this file some body can find what is wrong in your
> > > calculations.
> > > > > > Bests.
> > > > > > Javad Hashemifar
> > > > > > --- Michael Gurnett <michael.gurnett at kau.se> wrote:
> > > > > > > yes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Title
> > > > > > > -6.00 0.002 1.500 0.003 EMIN, DE, EMAX,
> Gauss-broadening(>;de)
> > > > > > > 6 NUMBER OF DOS-CASES specified below
> > > > > > > 0 1 total atom, case=column in qtl-header,
> label
> > > > > > > 1 1 Atom1 tot
> > > > > > > 1 2 Atom1 s
> > > > > > > 1 3 Atom1 p
> > > > > > > 2 1 Atom2 tot
> > > > > > > 34 2 Atom34 s
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:36 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If I look at the s-Dos for atom 34 I have intensities
> ranging
> > > from
> > > > > > > > > approximately -13 eV and up. There is no sign of any
> intensity
> > > > > > > between -13
> > > > > > > > > and -100 eV.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Did you lower Emin in case.int to proper values (may be -6.
> Ryd)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Javad
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > From: "Javad Hashemifar" <s_javad at yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > > > To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:05 AM
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wien] Lithium 1s energy
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to figure out why "analysis" is giving an
> energy
> > > of
> > > > > 0
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > the Li
> > > > > > > > > > > 1S. The energy cut-off has been set to -6 ryd (the
> system
> > > > > consists
> > > > > > > of 34
> > > > > > > > > Ge
> > > > > > > > > > > and 1 Li atom). The binding energy of the 1S should be
> att
> > > > > > > approximately
> > > > > > > > > 55
> > > > > > > > > > > eV relative to the top of the valence band maximum. Any
> > > > > suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > Hello
> > > > > > > > > > What about the partial DOS of Li 1S. Does it concentrated
> > > around 0
> > > > > Ryd
> > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > it is
> > > > > > > > > > within a reasonable range.
> > > > > > > > > > Bests,
> > > > > > > > > > Javad Hashemifar
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > =====
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list