[Wien] follow up - *warning* ENE:
fabella
wfabella at niu.edu
Thu Oct 28 03:34:59 CEST 2004
Hello Stefaan,
You were right about the change in RKMAX, i guess my cell was too large
for the value of NMATMAX. I'm running on pre-compiled Wien2k so i
don't think the situation is going to get any better.
However, the data does show physical signs of a "vacancy"
calculation...i don't feel i can rely on the total energy if there is a
"*warning*" next to ENE:.
So, I've found a smaller supercell for the vacancy: P, 2x2x2, 32 atom
cell (which reduces to 26) that may give results without warning
messages for ENE.
----------------
In the same token i want a pretty good k-mesh for the vacancy
calculation so i guess i have to sacrifice size of the supercell to do
this....otherwise RKMAX becomes large for NMATMAX. Is this correct?
More information about the Wien
mailing list