[Wien] LDA+U
Khuong P. Ong
ongpk at ihpc.a-star.edu.sg
Tue Aug 30 12:03:08 CEST 2005
Dear Wien2k users,
There is a problem that made me confuse a lot. I need your help.
I performed the LDA+U calculation for NiO as an example. The structure
file is as follow:
NiO
F LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2225_Fm-3m
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=bohr
7.927000 7.927000 7.927000 90.000000 90.000000 90.000000
ATOM 1: X=0.00000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.00000000
MULT= 1 ISPLIT= 2
Ni NPT= 781 R0=0.00010000 RMT= 2.0000 Z: 28.0
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
ATOM 2: X=0.50000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.00000000
MULT= 1 ISPLIT= 2
O NPT= 781 R0=0.00010000 RMT= 2.0000 Z: 8.0
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
NiO.indm
-9
1
1 1 2
0 0
NiO.inorb
1 2 0
PRATT 0.5
1 1 2
1
0.52 0.00
By this set up, everything ran well. But I'm not sure that it is right or
wrong.
But if I set up Ni as atom 2 and O as atom 1:
Title
F LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2225_Fm-3m
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=bohr
7.927000 7.927000 7.927000 90.000000 90.000000 90.000000
ATOM 1: X=0.50000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.00000000
MULT= 1 ISPLIT= 2
O NPT= 781 R0=0.00010000 RMT= 1.6500 Z: 8.0
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
ATOM 2: X=0.00000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.00000000
MULT= 1 ISPLIT= 2
Ni NPT= 781 R0=0.00010000 RMT= 2.0000 Z: 28.0
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
NiO.indm
-9
1
2 1 2
0 0
NiO.inorb
1 1 0
PRATT 0.5
2 1 2
1
0.52 0.00
I met the error
cycle 1 (Tue Aug 30 17:16:33 SGT 2005) (60/40 to go)
> lapw0 -p (17:16:33) starting parallel lapw0 at Tue Aug 30 17:16:33
SGT 2005
--------
running lapw0 in single mode
2.369u 0.117s 0:02.48 99.5% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
> orb -up -p (17:16:35) 0.003u 0.002s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
> stop error
I really do not understand why it crashed in this case. Did I set up the
input files wrongly?
Looking at the user guide page 80 and the lecture note by Novak the LDA+U
calculation was set up for two different Ni atoms with different index 1
and 2. The question is: should we need two different Ni atoms for LDA+U?
Many thanks for help.
Regards,
Khuong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20050830/31b275fd/attachment.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list