[Wien] fixed-spin-moment and normal spin-polarized calculations
carl
carlc at physics.usyd.edu.au
Thu Nov 10 06:53:44 CET 2005
Dear Wien2k Users
For Mn substitutional doped AlN supercell system, when I tried to compare
the total energy from the fixed-spin-moment (FSM) scheme with the one from
normal spin-polarized calculations, I observed quite weird behavior:
For the normal spin-polarization calculations, the calculation runs well
and the produced result is as expected---which gives a 4 mu_B/cell, and the
total energy is -11357.236702 Ry.
However, if I use the FSM method with the fixed moment = 4 mu_B/cell, the
calculation looks (only looks!) good, that is, the energy and the charge
density converged very well, and without any suspicious signals. (in
*in2cup, the number of spin-up electron is 232, and in *in2cdn, the spin-dn
electron number is 224 --- which are as expected). But the converged total
energy is -11356.396458 Ry! Moreover, the converged total magnetic moment
is 5.196 mu_B, not the expected 4 mu_B!
Note in these two calculations, I used same structure, same parameters. The
other difference is that for normal s-p using command "runsp_lapw -cc
0.00001 -i 40"
and for the FSM using
"runfsm_lapw -m 4 -cc 0.00001 -i 40"
Also I have tried the several bcc-Fe using FSM with different fixed moments
--- FSM works fine, I got the expected magnetic moments.
Now I got really puzzled --- it seems that the current FSM is not capable
for Mn-doped AlN case? --- FSM should be rather straightforward .
I attached the supercell *.struct file for your inspection.
Many thanks in advance and best wishes to you all,
Carl CUI
School of Physics,
The University of Sydney, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: AlN-Mn-fsm.struct
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6608 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20051110/8d0a4636/AlN-Mn-fsm.obj
More information about the Wien
mailing list