[Wien] EFG interpretation
Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Thu Aug 16 13:08:47 CEST 2007
Where is the problem ?
It is a spin-polarized calculation, thus you must "add" the spin-up and dn
contributions (there are 2 :VZZxxx lines in your scf file)
You can then see that the sum of these VZZxxx values is close to the EFG tensor
BEFORE diagonalization.
In addition, note that "EFG" in this case is NOT the z-component, but it is Vyy
(after diagonalization!!)
QXX QXY QYY QZZ UP TO R
:VZZ009: 1.91724 0.25866 -4.14601 2.22878 1.900
:VZZ009: -2.98820 0.68880 5.47352 -2.48532 1.900
:EFG009: EFG = 1.62283 *10**21 V / m**2
V20 TOT/SRF= -0.20690 0.00662
V22 TOT/SRF= -1.16593 0.00950
V22M TOT/SRF= 0.94908 0.01564
V21 TOT/SRF= 0.00000 0.00000
V21M TOT/SRF= 0.00000 0.00000
-1.04648 0.94908 0.00000 -1.38393 0.00000 0.00000
0.94908 1.28539 0.00000 0.00000 1.62283 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 -0.23890 0.00000 0.00000 -0.23890
> The Vzz and EFG values are:
>
> Atom Vzz(*.output2up) :VZZ(*.scf) :EFG(*.scf)
> Fe1 2.24055 2.22602 1.61974*10**21V/m**2
> Fe2 0.76251 0.76631 -5.23282*10**21V/m**2 ---> ???
>
> I don't understand why the Vzz values in *.output2up and *.scf files
> are similar whereas :EFG is very different. In the example (for Indium) in the
> userguide these values are quite similar.
>
> Could you kindly explain me why these values are different?
> Or am I doing anything wrong?
>
> I am grateful to your kind help.
>
> Best Regards,
> Vidya
>
> P.S.: I have used the script "runsp_lapw -p -so -orb -cc 0.0001
> and *.output2up is obtained with using EFG tag instead of TOT in
> *.in2 file.
P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at WWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Wien
mailing list