[Wien] Hardware Benchmarks for lapw1c
Alexander Shaposhnikov
shaposh at isp.nsc.ru
Fri Jan 26 11:47:08 CET 2007
No, export USE_REMOTE=0 does not work either.
I think i have to recompile without mpi support.
This is very bad, as using BLAS-level parallelism i can
only get no more than 100% speedup.
I have tested PWScf (pw.x and cp.x), cpmd, and NWChem codes on this machine.
The Car-Parinello simulation jobs (cpmd, cp.x) seems to have the lowest
parallel speedup, as low as 2.5-3 times. Pw.x and nwchem jobs have 3X-5X
parallel speedup. All jobs with 1 k-pont only ("fine-grained parallelism").
I have also compared this machine (2 Quad-core cpus, 8cores) with quad
Itanium2 1.5GHz (4 CPUS).
Xeon workstation is 70%-100% faster in MPI jobs (2.5-3X faster in synthetic
tests). The latter is also several times less expensive. Itanium seems to
have very high efficiency, but this cant help to overcome low peak
floating-point performance (24Gigaflops only for the above-mentioned Quad
Itanium2).
Best Regards,
Alexander Shaposhnikov
On Friday 26 January 2007 16:01, Florent Boucher wrote:
> Dear Alexander,
> I was not thinking in using the MPI version but just the parallel
> script. You have to change of course the .machines files in order to put
> in the number of different process you want to start.
> May be you should correctly define the USE_REMOTE option in the
> parallel_options file located in $WIENROOT
> You should have
> setenv USE_REMOTE 0
> Regards
> Florent
More information about the Wien
mailing list