[Wien] Ghost Band and Spin Orbit Coupling Band Calculation for Bi
Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Sat Oct 27 20:31:27 CEST 2007
A qhick check of the data you sent reveals several possible problems:
> run_lapw -so
> x lapw1 -band
> x lapwso
> x spaghetti.
If you want SO bands, you need x spaghetti -so
> QTL-B VALUE .EQ. 10.47804 in Band of energy - 0.41098 ATOM=
> 1 L= 0
Yes, you have ghostbands.
> ATOMIC SPHERE DEPENDENT PARAMETERS FOR ATOM Bi1
> OVERALL ENERGY PARAMETER IS 0.3000
> OVERALL BASIS SET ON ATOM IS LAPW
> E( 2)= -0.1700 E(BOTTOM)= - 0.360 E(TOP)= 0.020
> APW+lo
> E( 2)= 0.3000
> LOCAL ORBITAL
> E( 0)= 0.1200 E(BOTTOM)= -0.660 E(TOP)= 0.900
> APW+lo
> E( 0)= 0.0005
> LOCAL ORBITAL
> E( 1)= 0.3000
> APW+lo
>
> K= 0.05000 0.05000 0.05000 1
> :RKM : MATRIX SIZE 146LOs: 30 RKM= 6.85 WEIGHT= 2.00 PGR:
> EIGENVALUES ARE:
> -0.4106008 -0.2248095 -0.2248095 -0.1990911 -0.1990911
> -0.1972398 -0.1132902 -0.1053402 -0.1053402 -0.0790426
> -0.0790426 0.2221233 0.3902385 0.4176217 0.4176217
> 0.6946178 0.7236864 0.7249391 0.7249391 0.8138934
> 0.8557083 0.8557083 0.9123181 1.0734300 1.0734300
> 1.6118069 1.6118069 1.6974122 1.8054132 1.8605886
> 1.8605886 1.9831581 1.9831581 2.0456323 2.1117763
> 2.1117763 2.2090826 2.2090826 2.2516513 2.2673514
>
> 2.3173559 2.3952378 2.3952378 2.4165511 2.4623928
> 2.4770960 2.4770960 2.5534038 2.6654239 2.6654239
> 2.6758456 2.7499461 2.7794123 2.7879459 2.7879459
> 2.8609063 2.8609063 2.9093091 2.9367524 2.9367524
> 2.9973414 3.0675987 3.0675987 3.1607611 3.1607611
> 3.1626438 3.2016070 3.2016070 3.3103052
> ********************************************************
>
> NUMBER OF K-POINTS: 110
> 0.0 0.0 angle (M,z), angle (M,x) deg
> RELATIVISTIC LOs:
> on atom 1 e( 1 )= -5.82749999999998
>
>
> SPIN-ORBIT EIGENVALUES:
> K= 0.05000 0.05000 0.05000 1
> MATRIX SIZE= 150 WEIGHT= 2.00
> EIGENVALUES ARE:
> -5.8257559 -5.8253744 -5.8245165 - 5.8241350 -3.2827295
> -3.2825076 -3.2819354 -3.2817976 -3.2815757 -3.2811225
> -3.2803820 -3.2795692 -0.4105841 -0.4105841 -0.2629474
> -0.2629474 -0.2604524 -0.2604524 -0.2526100 -0.2526100
> -0.2503525 -0.2503525 -0.1507602 -0.1507602 -0.1087296
> - 0.1087295 -0.0995931 -0.0995931 -0.0554644 -0.0554644
> -0.0529689 -0.0529689 -0.0488590 -0.0488590 0.2221748
> 0.2221751 0.3502867 0.3502903 0.4424264 0.4424298
>
> 0.4641082 0.4641102 0.6621771 0.6621804 0.7122195
> 0.7122199 0.7509970 0.7509991 0.7635048 0.7635063
> 0.8133581 0.8133582 0.8491332 0.8491333 0.8691713
> 0.8691713 0.9148027 0.9148030 1.0743300 1.0743301
> 1.0751390 1.0751390
> ********************************************************
When you compare no-so and so-eigenvalues, you see big changes and
eigenvalues appear at -5 to -3 eV. This cannot come from the effect of
SO !!!
> I have increased energy parameter of the L=0 level in atom 1 to 5, but
> that doesn't seem to solve the problem.
> My .in1 file is given by:
> WFFIL (WFPRI, SUPWF)
> 7.00 10 4 (R-MT*K-MAX; MAX L IN WF, V-NMT
> 0.30 5 0 (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global
> APW/LAPW)
> 2 -1.54 0.010 CONT 1
> 2 0.30 0.000 CONT 1
> 0 -0.73 0.010 CONT 1
> 0 5 0.000 CONT 1
This file is fixedformat, so the line above is not valid!!!
> WFFIL
> 4 1 0 llmax,ipr,kpot
> -10.0000 1.50000 emin,emax (output energy window)
> 1. 1. 1. direction of magnetization (lattice vectors)
> 1 number of atoms for which RLO is added
> 1 -4.97 0.005 atom number,e-lo,de (case.in1), repeat NX times
You add a p-RLO at - 4.97 Ry ! Why ??
Do you have a p "semicore state, i.e. in case.in1 a p (l=1) LO ?
NO.
So remove this and set NLO-number to zero.
Restart from non-SO results (provided they are ok).
More information about the Wien
mailing list