[Wien] Ghost bands error in SrTiO3 calculation at high RKmax
Ye Zhu
ye.zhu at monash.edu
Thu Jun 14 03:54:13 CEST 2012
Hi all,
I am running a calculation for SrTiO3 empty DOS using the newest version of
WIEN2k. An error I got is
Error in LAPW2
'l2main' - QTL-B.GT.15., Ghostbands, check scf files
which occurred during the very first round when I used RKmax = 8. .scf2
file shows:
QTL-B VALUE .EQ. 143.22898 in Band of energy 0.44165 ATOM=
1 L= 0
Check for ghostbands or EIGENVALUES BELOW XX messages
Adjust your Energy-parameters for this ATOM and L (or use -in1new
switch), check RMTs !!!
:WARN : QTL-B value eq. 143.23 in Band of energy 0.44165
ATOM= 1 L= 0
:WARN : You should change the E-parameter for this atom and
L-value in case.in1 (or try the -in1new switch)
and I also found: Energy to separate low and high
energystates: -999.00000
Similar information is in .output2 : Energy to separate
semicore and valence states: -999.000000000000
Why the energy to separate semicore and valence states cannot be found? I
have tried RKmax = 6, 7, 7.5, 8.5, 9, 10, and all went through without the
Ghostbands error. But I did see a number of warnings when RKmax > 8 :
:WAR : 1 EIGENVALUES BELOW THE ENERGY -9.00000
:WAR : 1 EIGENVALUES BELOW THE ENERGY -9.00000
:WAR : 1 EIGENVALUES BELOW THE ENERGY -9.00000
Is this a Emin problem? These problems at high RKmax make me worry about my
calculation. The following is my .in1 file
WFFIL EF=.41905 (WFFIL, WFPRI, ENFIL, SUPWF)
8.0 10 4 (R-MT*K-MAX; MAX L IN WF, V-NMT
.23 6 0 global e-param with N other choices, napw
0 0.200 0.000 CONT 0
0 -2.000 0.002 CONT 0
1 0.240 0.000 CONT 0
1 -0.690 0.002 CONT 0
2 0.267 0.000 CONT 1
2 1.100 0.000 CONT 1 <<<<
.23 6 0 global e-param with N other choices, napw
0 0.155 0.000 CONT 0
0 -3.800 0.002 STOP 0
1 0.233 0.000 CONT 0
1 -2.000 0.002 CONT 0
2 0.200 0.000 CONT 1
2 0.800 0.000 CONT 1 <<<<<
.23 4 0 global e-param with N other choices, napw
0 0.277 0.000 CONT 0
0 -0.750 0.002 CONT 0
1 0.268 0.000 CONT 0
1 1.300 0.000 CONT 0 <<<<<<
K-VECTORS FROM UNIT:4 -9.0 3.0 42 emin/emax/nband #red
Most of the energies were determined using -in1new switch, and I added
high-lying local d-orbitals for Sr (atom1) and Ti (atom2), and local
p-orbital for O (atom3) (highlighted by arrows), hoping to improve the
calculation for empty DOS. The energies of these high-lying orbitals were
determined from looking at DOS plots and choosing the middle of the
interesting energy range. I increased Emax to 3.0 Ry also for the same
purpose. The following the the .in1 file right after -in1new for comparison:
WFFIL EF=.42815 (WFFIL, WFPRI, ENFIL, SUPWF)
9.00 10 4 (R-MT*K-MAX; MAX L IN WF, V-NMT
.22815 5 0 global e-param with N other choices, napw
0 0.195 0.000 CONT 0
0 -1.976 0.000 CONT 0
1 0.237 0.000 CONT 0
1 -0.659 0.000 CONT 0
2 0.267 0.000 CONT 1
.22815 6 0 global e-param with N other choices, napw
0 0.155 0.000 CONT 0
0 -3.689 0.001 STOP 0
1 0.233 0.000 CONT 0
1 -1.961 0.000 CONT 0
2 0.198 0.000 CONT 1
2 -0.766 0.000 CONT 1 <<<<<
.22815 3 0 global e-param with N other choices, napw
0 0.277 0.000 CONT 0
0 -0.781 0.000 CONT 0
1 0.268 0.000 CONT 0
K-VECTORS FROM UNIT:4 -9.0 3.0 42 emin/emax/nband #red
There is one local d-orbital with -0.766 Ry for Ti which I don't quite
understand. As I care about DOS above Fermi level, I changed it to 0.8 Ry.
The volume optimization worked fine with both .in1 files, but I am always
worrying about my modifications. Please let me now if anyone knows what the
problem is or needs any more information.
Thank you very much,
Ye
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120614/71aa504a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Wien
mailing list