[Wien] U , J and effective U
Fecher, Gerhard
fecher at uni-mainz.de
Wed Apr 29 08:15:30 CEST 2015
Please read the review by Anisimov et al. :
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9 (1997) 767
or some of his original works
Phys Rev B 43 1991 7570
Phys Rev B 44 1991 943
btw: the Coulomb interaction does not depend on the spin, indeed.
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
====================================
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
Johannes Gutenberg - University
55099 Mainz
and
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids
01187 Dresden
________________________________________
Von: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at [wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von delamora [delamora at unam.mx]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. April 2015 21:09
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [Wien] U , J and effective U
Dear WIEN2k community,
I have a discussion with my Professor, John B Goodenough, and I would like to share with you.
Is the U or the effective U (U-J) the same for up and down spin?
We are working in ruthenates and in some cases they are half metals, so the mobility of the up and down spins is different so the intraatomic correlation should be also different.
Yours
Pablo de la Mora
More information about the Wien
mailing list