[Wien] berryPI
Oleg Rubel
orubel at lakeheadu.ca
Tue Sep 8 14:07:09 CEST 2015
That seems to be the case (http://www.cryst.ehu.es/cgi-bin/cryst/programs/nph-wp-list?gnum=140).
If both structures possess the inversion symmetry, it will be pointless to calculate polarization.
Oleg
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 03:48, Fecher, Gerhard <fecher at uni-mainz.de> wrote:
>
> I thought that I4/mcm is also a centrosymmetric space group ?
>
> Ciao
> Gerhard
>
> DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
> "I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
> is that you have never actually known what the question is."
>
> ====================================
> Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
> Institut of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
> Johannes Gutenberg - University
> 55099 Mainz
> and
> Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids
> 01187 Dresden
> ________________________________________
> Von: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at [wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von Oleg Rubel [orubel at lakeheadu.ca]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. September 2015 01:03
> An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
> Betreff: Re: [Wien] berryPI
>
> The essence of electronic polarization is that it is a “relative” quantity, i.e., its calculation (and measurement too) requires a reference point. The reference structure is not always centrosymmetric. An example of non-centrosymmetric reference structure is zinc-blende GaN that is taken as P=0 in computing the spontaneous polarization of the wurtzite GaN (see https://github.com/spichardo/BerryPI/wiki/Tutorial-4:-Polarization-in-GaN).
>
> For the second part of the question on EuTiO3, enclosed structure files would certainly help. One possible strategy would be to explore a gradual evolution of the polarization between cubic and tetragonal structures.
>
>
> I hope this will help
> Oleg
>
>
>
>> On Sep 7, 2015, at 3:42 AM, nilofar hadaeghi <n.hadaeghi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all
>> I have studied some papers whose authors are S.J.Ahmed or O.Rubel in which building the centrosymmetric and noncentrosymmetric structure for the calculation of spontaneous polarization has been explained, but it is still ambiguous for me.
>> Could you please help me whether the noncentrosymmetric structure must exist in the nature or it is enough to apply a displacement to the central atom of the centrosymmetric structure and then use the new structure as the noncentrosymmetric one?!
>> For instance I am working on EuTiO3 in which a structural transition at temperature 282(k) from cubic to tetragonal ( from Pm3m space group to I4/mcm) occurs. Now, would you please help me whether I use the structure in I4/mcm space group as the noncentrosymmetric structure or I must change the positions of the centrosymmetric structure and use the achieved structure as the noncentrosymmetric one?
>> I am using WIEN2k 14.2, Python version: 2.7.3 and Numpy version: 1.6.2.
>> Sincerely yours,
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wien mailing list
>> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list