[Wien] magnetizatin direction in case.inso vs case.inst
pluto
pluto at physics.ucdavis.edu
Sat Oct 12 13:15:13 CEST 2024
Dear Prof. Blaha, dear All,
I would like to make a collinear magnetic+SOC calculation that simulates
the sample magnetized in opposite directions along some easy axis. I am
looking both at ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic samples, where only some
atoms are magnetic. Could you please tell me the correct procedure.
One can set the direction of magnetization in case.inso and in
case.inst.
One can see sizes of magnetic moments through:
grep :MM case.scf
How are all the three things (inso, inst, and scf) related?
I would assume that case.inso only sets the quantization axis (but does
not physically change the directions of magnetic moments). Therefore,
for two identical calculations but with inso at [001] and [00-1], the
result should be exactly the same in energy, but the spin up/dn weights
of orbital characters should be swapped. Spin-integrated (adding up+dn)
weights of the Ylm orbitals should not change in such case.
But then what is the precise meaning of the u/d/n when producing the
case.inst using instgen_lapw? Are those, for the SOC calculation,
ultimately referring to the quantization axis set in case.inso? I mean,
would setting "up" in case.inst mean the moment oriented in real space
along the direction set by instgen_lapw in case.inso?
Also, what do the magnetic moments in case.scf mean? They have signs, so
they must refer to some quantization axis.
Best,
Lukasz
More information about the Wien
mailing list