[Wien] lapwdm with ROOT option in case.in2
Masao ARAI
ARAI.Masao at nims.go.jp
Thu Jun 28 08:34:35 CEST 2007
Dear WIEN2k users and depelopers,
I have experienced a strange problem about LSDA+U calculation
with ROOT option in case.in2. Is the ROOT option compatible with
lapwdm?
Let me explain the situation.
(1) First, I performed standard LSDA+U calculations with
"TETRA" option in case.in2.
I obtained well converged insulating ground state.
(2) I modified the case.in2 and set "ROOT" option. Then I restarded
the LSDA+U calculations with converged charge density and case.dmat* files.
However, the calculuation was converged to the completely different state.
At the first iteration, the eigenvalue agreed with those from (1). But, the
density matrices computed from lapwdm were different from those in (1).
I suspect that the lapwdm is not compatible with ROOT option.
The lapw2 emits weights to case.weighdn and case.weighup. These weights
are then read by lapwdm. When the ROOT option is used, the weights
emitted by
lapw2 are just proportinal to the multiplicities of k-points.
Even states higher than Fermi energy have non zero weights in case.weighdn
and case.weighup.
Note, the weights in case.weightup/dn (file no.11) are
appropriately truncated at EF and the weights of states with higher
energy are zero.(around line 455-462 in lapw2.F)
455 DO IE=1,NE(K)
456 wei=WEIGH(k,ie)
457 eee= E(k+(ie-1)*2*nkpt)
458 IF (eee.lt.eeeo) shift=0.
459 eeeo=eee
460 eee=eee+shift
461 IF (eee.gt.EF) wei=0.
462 WRITE(11,79) eee,wei
463 END DO
But, the weights in case.weighup (file no.26)and case.weighdn (no.27)
are emitted without any special treatment. (line 333 and 351 in lapw2.F)
333 write(26)(WEIGH(J,N), N=1,NE(J))
351 write(27)(WEIGH(J,N), N=1,NE(J))
Of course, the states higer than EF will not be used in lapw2 because
the varibale nemax is appropriately adjusted.
In lapwdm, the weights are read from case.weighdn/up.
Then all states are used for computation of the density matrices.
(There is no trick like nemax in lapw2). So, if the ROOT option is used,
the lapwdm seems to give wrong values.
Your sincerely,
--
Masao Arai
NIMS(National Institute for Materials Science)
CMSC(Computational Materials Science Center)
Tsukuba Japan
More information about the Wien
mailing list