[Wien] error showing : libmkl_intel_lp64.so: cannot open shared object file

Sat Jul 16 10:45:17 CEST 2011

Also, albeit going a bit outside DFT, you might have a superstructure that
would be hard to see with lab XRD. Check the weak peaks in the difference,
the (Reitfeld?) R1 as well as whether Shelx suggests twinning or something
else. See if someone can check with TEM.
On Jul 16, 2011 3:37 AM, "Laurence Marks" <L-marks at northwestern.edu> wrote:
> You need to look at the transition from filled (last number 1 for spin
> polarized, 2 if not) to empty; both bands you showed are full. Look at
> higher energies.
>
> Hunch, it has oxygen vacancies and these will not show that well in the
XRD
> intensities. Check the stoichiometry by hand, and also look at the bond
> valence sums. The later are given roughly in case.outputnn or you can use
> KDIST (not a Wien2k code, but free to download, google it).
>
> Almost certainly it is something like this, or something worse such as you
> have the metal composition wrong and impurities, perhaps even
> antiferromagnetic ordering. Wrong models often converge badly.
> On Jul 16, 2011 12:01 AM, "shamik chakrabarti" <shamikphy at gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Dear Laurence Marks Sir,
>>
>> a) Sir it is an insulator experimentally....conductivity 10^(-7) S/cm
>> But as you have told I can not find any gap from the "dirty DOS" as
>> given below.
>>
>> band 154 -0.0035740378 0.0033882757 0.100000D+01
>> band 155 0.0044596281 0.0079912962 0.100000D+01
>>
>> Then why it is not showing any gap?....we still believe that structural
>> model is ok!
>>
>> b) convergence criteria are 0.0001 for both energy and charge
>> final value of :DIS is 0.0070262
>> Charge convergence is achieved up to 0.0438054
>> Energy convergence is achieved up to 0.000296635
>> c) No I am not doing a minimization...rather a normal SCF
>>
>> Sir, the XRD is same as it is obtained experimentally. It has exactly the
>> same number of peaks at same relative intensity at the same 2theta value.
>>
>> But from "dirty DOS" it is clear that the material is not showing any gap
>> while we are trying to force it by applying GGA+U. May be this is the
> reason
>> for not having the convergence yet!.....now we have to find out the
reason
>> for this.
>>
>> Any suggestion in this regard will be very helpful for us.
>>
>> with best regards,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Laurence Marks <L-marks at northwestern.edu
>>wrote:
>>
>>> If you really have an insulator, then it should not take 120
>>> iterations to converge -- something must be wrong.
>>> a) Is it really an insulator? Look in case.output2up which gives a
>>> "dirty DOS", i.e. a printout of which states are occupied and their
>>> energy. Is there a gap?
>>> b) What convergence criteria are you using? What is the (final) value of
>>> :DIS?
>>> c) Are you doing a minimization (MSR1a), in which case 120 iterations is
>>> "fine".
>>>
>>> I suggest that you do not try mBJ, it is harder to converge and should
>>> only be used as a final test.
>>>
>>> N.B., are you sure that the XRD is the same -- check numbers not just
>>> spacings as the later are determined by your choice of cell.
>>>
>>> 2011/7/14 shamik chakrabarti <shamikphy at gmail.com>:
>>> > Dear Laurence Marks Sir and wien2k users,
>>> > Sorry for late reply to this mail. Actually I was trying
>>> to
>>> > solve the compilation problem and eventually able to solve it by
> getting
>>> a
>>> > hints from the previous mail in the mailing list. After changing
> -pthread
>>> to
>>> > -lpthread in Linker flag OPTION we saw that wien2k was able to run as
>>> > before.
>>> > Sir, I now want to discuss the next problem about 130 iterations. I
was
>>> > running calculation on a spinel compound with space group Fd3m and
> having
>>> > different occupancies at the same lattice site. To incorporate those
>>> > occupancies we have generated a 56 atom supercell with target lattice
>>> > primitive. By giving the lattice parameters and structural coordinates
> of
>>> > the supercell in another software viz. powdcell we have observed that
> it
>>> is
>>> > giving the same XRD pattern as we have obtained experimentally. So as
> far
>>> as
>>> > the structural model is concerned it should be alright. We have used
14
> K
>>> > points and mixing parameter 0.2 with mixing scheme MSR1.
>>> > Now my questions are the following:
>>> > (i) As it is an oxide material having insulating property, we have
used
>>> > GGA+U approach with a U = 5eV for Fe. Is it possible that
>>> > different U value may improve the convergence?
>>> > (ii) Should we go for MBJ type potential?
>>> > (iii) Except the above two alternatives is there any other approach
> which
>>> > can help us to reach near the actual physical model by
>>> > improving the convergence?
>>> > Any response will be very helpful for us. Thanking you,
>>> > with best regards,
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Laurence Marks <
>>> L-marks at northwestern.edu>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> The error is exactly what it says it is.
>>> >>
>>> >> Possible sources:
>>> >> a) After your power failure you did not appropriately mount the intel
>>> >> libraries across computers
>>> >> b) They are not in your library path (source the appropriate XXX.sh
>>> >> and/or XXX.csh in the location where they are installed, checking
this
>>> >> with, for instance, "which ifort").
>>> >> c) You do not have your .bashrc or other initializing correct to
>>> >> include the appropriate libraries.
>>> >> d) You do not have the intel libraries in your default library path
--
>>> >> do "man ldd", "man ldconfig" and "ldd $WIENROOT/lapw0" then think
>>> >> about the output and information.
>>> >>
>>> >> None of these are Wien2k problems, they are problems with your OS.
>>> >>
>>> >> In the future I would suggest that you use -i-static which will avoid
>>> >> these issues.
>>> >>
>>> >> N.B., 130 iterations is an awfully large number unless you are
running
>>> >> a minimization. If this is just a straight scf then something is very
>>> >> wrong with your physical model.
>>> >>
>>> >> 2011/7/11 shamik chakrabarti <shamikphy at gmail.com>:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Dear Wien2k users,
>>> >> > I was running a calculation for a 56 atom unit
>>> >> > cell.
>>> >> > It has run for 130 iterations so far, but after that due to power
>>> >> > failure
>>> >> > the system got shut down. When we want to start the calculation
from
>>> >> > where
>>> >> > it ends, we have chosen the " run anyway" option. But then it
> stopped
>>> >> > showing the following error:
>>> >> > /home/shamik81/WIEN2k/lapw0: error while loading shared libraries:
>>> >> > libmkl_intel_lp64.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
> or
>>> >> > directory
>>> >> >> stop error
>>> >> > Although the shared libraries are at its proper place (in
>>> >> > intel64/lib/mkl)
>>> >> > it is showing the above error. As wien2k has been compiled properly
>>> and
>>> >> > has
>>> >> > already run for 130 iterations without any trouble what is the
cause
>>> for
>>> >> > such an error?
>>> >> > We are using composerxe-2011.4.191 compiler and wien2k 11 for our
>>> >> > calculation
>>> >> > We are not able to figure out the reason of such an error and can
> not
>>> >> > move
>>> >> > any further. Any response in this regard will be highly
appreciated.
>>> >> > with regards,
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Shamik Chakrabarti
>>> >> > Research Scholar
>>> >> > Dept. of Physics & Meteorology
>>> >> > Material Processing & Solid State Ionics Lab
>>> >> > IIT Kharagpur
>>> >> > Kharagpur 721302
>>> >> > INDIA
>>> >> >
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > Wien mailing list
>>> >> > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>> >> > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Laurence Marks
>>> >> Department of Materials Science and Engineering
>>> >> MSE Rm 2036 Cook Hall
>>> >> 2220 N Campus Drive
>>> >> Northwestern University
>>> >> Evanston, IL 60208, USA
>>> >> Tel: (847) 491-3996 Fax: (847) 491-7820
>>> >> email: L-marks at northwestern dot edu
>>> >> Web: www.numis.northwestern.edu
>>> >> Chair, Commission on Electron Crystallography of IUCR
>>> >> www.numis.northwestern.edu/
>>> >> Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
>>> >> nobody else has thought
>>> >> Albert Szent-Gyorgi
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Wien mailing list
>>> >> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>> >> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Shamik Chakrabarti
>>> > Research Scholar
>>> > Dept. of Physics & Meteorology
>>> > Material Processing & Solid State Ionics Lab
>>> > IIT Kharagpur
>>> > Kharagpur 721302
>>> > INDIA
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Wien mailing list
>>> > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>> > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Laurence Marks
>>> Department of Materials Science and Engineering
>>> MSE Rm 2036 Cook Hall
>>> 2220 N Campus Drive
>>> Northwestern University
>>> Evanston, IL 60208, USA
>>> Tel: (847) 491-3996 Fax: (847) 491-7820
>>> email: L-marks at northwestern dot edu
>>> Web: www.numis.northwestern.edu
>>> Chair, Commission on Electron Crystallography of IUCR
>>> www.numis.northwestern.edu/
>>> Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
>>> nobody else has thought
>>> Albert Szent-Gyorgi
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wien mailing list
>>> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shamik Chakrabarti
>> Research Scholar
>> Dept. of Physics & Meteorology
>> Material Processing & Solid State Ionics Lab
>> IIT Kharagpur
>> Kharagpur 721302
>> INDIA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20110716/ad87722f/attachment.htm>