[Wien] Comparison between wien2k calculated and experimental

[sikander Azam]

Dear Karel
Thanks sir for the comment, yes sir sure mostly I am working on the optic
sides, it will be great if share your comments on this. But i will also
want to know about the electronic structure, if possible.
Regards
SIkander

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Karel Vyborny <vybornyk at fzu.cz> wrote:

> Dear Sikander,
> it is not clear in what respect you are trying to compare WIEN2k to
> experiments.  Let me add to what Stefaan sent you another quantity:
> optical absorption. Attached is an example of the calculated imaginary part
> of epsilon to be compared with experimental data shown in Fig. 1 of PRB 11,
> 1315. The agreement is, to my taste, satisfactory but there are some clear
> differences too. If you are interested in this, I'd be happy to comment.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Karel
>
>
> --- x ---
> dr. Karel Vyborny
> Fyzikalni ustav AV CR, v.v.i.
> Cukrovarnicka 10
> Praha 6, CZ-16253
> tel: +420220318459
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, sikander Azam wrote:
>
> Dear allI have a query about comparing my calculation using the WIEN2K code
>> with experimental data. We are doing our calculations at absolute
>> temperature and the experimentalist is doing his measurement at room
>> temperature or above. Then how I compare my calculations with the
>> experimental,.
>> Regards
>> SIkander
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20160321/5fed1c73/attachment-0001.html>